Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Talanta ; 255: 124200, 2023 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2165885

ABSTRACT

Vaccination is an effective strategy to fight COVID-19. However, the effectiveness of the vaccine varies among different populations in varying immune effects. Neutralizing antibody (NAb) level is an important indicator to evaluate the protective effect of immune response after vaccination. Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) is a rapid, safe and sensitivity detection method, which has great potential in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 NAb. In this study, a fluorescent beads-based lateral flow immunoassay (FBs-LFIA) and a latex beads-based LFIA (LBs-LFIA) using double antigen sandwich (DAS) strategy were established to detect NAbs in the serum of vaccinated people. The limit of detection (LoD) of the FBs-LFIA was 1.13 ng mL- 1 and the LBs-LFIA was 7.11 ng mL- 1. The two LFIAs were no cross-reactive with sera infected by other pathogenic bacteria. Furthermore, the two LFIAs showed a good performance in testing clinical samples. The sensitivity of FBs-LFIA and LBs-LFIA were 97.44% (95%CI: 93.15%-99.18%) and 98.29% (95%CI: 95.84%-99.37%), and the specificity were 98.28% (95%CI: 95.37%-99.45%) and 97.70% (95%CI: 94.82%-99.06%) compared with the conventional virus neutralization test (cVNT), respectively. Notably, the LBs-LFIA was also suitable for whole blood sample, requiring only 3 µL of whole blood, which provided the possibility to detect NAbs at home. To sum up, the two LFIAs based on double antigen sandwich established by us can rapidly, safely, sensitively and accurately detect SARS-CoV-2 NAb in human serum.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Neutralization Tests , Immunoassay/methods , Antibodies, Viral , Antigens , Antibodies, Neutralizing
2.
Front Immunol ; 12: 769442, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1686473

ABSTRACT

The prevention of the COVID-19 pandemic is highly complicated by the prevalence of asymptomatic and recurrent infection. Many previous immunological studies have focused on symptomatic and convalescent patients, while the immune responses in asymptomatic patients and re-detectable positive cases remain unclear. Here we comprehensively analyzed the peripheral T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of 54 COVID-19 patients in different courses, including asymptomatic, symptomatic, convalescent, and re-detectable positive cases. We identified a set of V-J gene combinations characterizing the upward immune responses through asymptomatic and symptomatic courses. Furthermore, some of these V-J combinations could be awakened in the re-detectable positive cases, which may help predict the risk of recurrent infection. Therefore, TCR repertoire examination has the potential to strengthen the clinical surveillance and the immunotherapy development for COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/pathology , Immunoglobulin J-Chains/genetics , Immunoglobulin Variable Region/genetics , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Adaptive Immunity/genetics , Adaptive Immunity/immunology , Adult , Aged , Asymptomatic Infections , COVID-19/immunology , Female , Gene Expression/genetics , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/genetics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
3.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 11: 791660, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1599571

ABSTRACT

The appearance and magnitude of the immune response and the related factors correlated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination need to be defined. Here, we enrolled a prospective cohort of 52 participants who received two doses of inactivated vaccines (BBIBP-CorV). Their serial plasma samples (n = 260) over 2 months were collected at five timepoints. We measured antibody responses (NAb, S-IgG and S-IgM) and routine blood parameter. NAb seroconversion occurred in 90.7% of vaccinated individuals and four typical NAb kinetic curves were observed. All of the participants who seroconverted after the first dose were females and had relatively high prevaccine estradiol levels. Moreover, those without seroconversion tended to have lower lymphocyte counts and higher serum SAA levels than those who experienced seroconversion. The NAb titers in young vaccine recipients had a significantly higher peak than those in elderly recipients. S-IgG and S-IgM dynamics were accompanied by similar trends in NAb. Here, we gained insight into the dynamic changes in NAbs and preliminarily explored the prevaccine blood parameters related to the kinetic subclasses, providing a reference for vaccination strategies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Aged , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Antibody Formation , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines, Inactivated
4.
Front Immunol ; 12: 716075, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1359192

ABSTRACT

The existence of asymptomatic and re-detectable positive coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients presents the disease control challenges of COVID-19. Most studies on immune responses in COVID-19 have focused on moderately or severely symptomatic patients; however, little is known about the immune response in asymptomatic and re-detectable positive (RP) patients. Here we performed a comprehensive analysis of the transcriptomic profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 48 COVID-19 patients which included 8 asymptomatic, 13 symptomatic, 15 recovered and 12 RP patients. The weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) identified six co-expression modules, of which the turquoise module was positively correlated with the asymptomatic, symptomatic, and recovered COVID-19 patients. The red module positively correlated with symptomatic patients only and the blue and brown modules positively correlated with the RP patients. The analysis by single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) revealed a lower level of IFN response and complement activation in the asymptomatic patients compared with the symptomatic, indicating a weaker immune response of the PBMCs in the asymptomatic patients. In addition, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) analysis showed the enrichment of TNFα/NF-κB and influenza infection in the RP patients compared with the recovered patients, indicating a hyper-inflammatory immune response in the PBMC of RP patients. Thus our findings could extend our understanding of host immune response during the progression of COVID-19 disease and assist clinical management and the immunotherapy development for COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Asymptomatic Diseases , COVID-19/immunology , Carrier State/immunology , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Transcriptome/genetics , Adult , Carrier State/virology , Complement Activation/immunology , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Inflammation/immunology , Influenza, Human/complications , Interferons/blood , Interferons/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Transcriptome/immunology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism , Young Adult
5.
Front Immunol ; 12: 662465, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1337636

ABSTRACT

To systematically explore potential biomarkers which can predict disease severity in COVID-19 patients and prevent the occurrence or development of severe COVID-19, the levels of 440 factors were analyzed in patients categorized according to COVID-19 disease severity; including asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe, convalescent and healthy control groups. Factor candidates were validated by ELISA and functional relevance was uncovered by bioinformatics analysis. To identify potential biomarkers of occurrence or development of COVID-19, patient sera from three different severity groups (moderate, severe, and critical) at three time points (admission, remission, and discharge) and the expression levels of candidate biomarkers were measured. Eleven differential factors associated with disease severity were pinpointed from 440 factors across 111 patients of differing disease severity. The dynamic changes of GDF15 reflect the progression of the disease, while the other differential factors include TRAIL R1, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-4, VCAM-1, sFRP-3, FABP2, Transferrin, GDF15, IL-1F7, IL-5Rα, and CD200. Elevation of white blood cell count, neutrophil count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Alanine aminotransferase and Aspartate aminotransferase, low lymphocyte and eosinophil counts in the severe group were associated with the severity of COVID-19. GDF15 levels were observed to be associated with the severity of COVID-19 and the dynamic change of GDF15 levels was closely associated with the COVID-19 disease progression. Therefore, GDF15 might serve as an indicator of disease severity in COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/metabolism , COVID-19/immunology , Growth Differentiation Factor 15/metabolism , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Adult , Aged , Computational Biology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL